Most people would
consider moving from New York to Los Angeles is pretty much the farthest you
can go in the contiguous United States. My move was a little more significant
in distance as my 1st layover was in LAX. Moving across the country is
one thing, moving to another continent is another, and moving from the northern
hemisphere to the Australia/Asia Pacific region of the southern hemisphere is a
completely different issue. From watching The Simpson’s (Bart-vs- Australia)I
learned of the main difference I would be facing; the vaunted Coriolis effect.
Water spinning in a
different direction down a drain was going to be a big change for me. I knew
that I would have to change and adapt to the new environment and my surrounding
not vice-versa; I was assuming I would have little to no impact on the
environment in return.
Shortly after arriving
in the southern hemisphere (specifically to the Australia/Asia Pacific region)
there were wild fires in Australia (not to uncommon), there was massive
flooding in Queensland (extremely uncommon), then there was cyclone Yasi which
tore through Queensland, multiple earthquakes in New Zealand; most of
Christchurch was levelled, and lastly there was a devastating 7.0 magnitude
earthquake in Japan that unleashed a map-changing tsunami; this tsunami also
lead to a nuclear plant melting down as well.
I have only been in
the Australia/Asia pacific region for 17 months now and there have been
numerous devastating moments that will forever be recorded in the history
books. Without trying to come across as a person that is having delusions of
grandeur; does the theory of the onset of these events coinciding with my
arrival in the region hold any water and if it does would that water be
effected by the Coriolis effect?